The value of a statistical life under ambiguity aversion
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
“the effect of risk aversion on the demand for life insurance: the case of iranian life insurance market”
abstract: about 60% of total premium of insurance industry is pertained?to life policies in the world; while the life insurance total premium in iran is less than 6% of total premium in insurance industry in 2008 (sigma, no 3/2009). among the reasons that discourage the life insurance industry is the problem of adverse selection. adverse selection theory describes a situation where the inf...
15 صفحه اولDecreasing aversion under ambiguity
Under which condition does the set of desirable uncertain prospects expand when wealth increases? We show that the decreasing concavity (DC) of the utility function is necessary and sufficient in the −maxmin expected utility model. In the smooth ambiguity aversion model with the ambiguity valuation function , the DC of and of ◦ is necessary and sufficient. An alternative definition of d...
متن کاملDelegated portfolio management under ambiguity aversion
We examine the problem of setting optimal incentives to a portfolio manager (to be employed by an investor through a contract) making an ambiguity-robust portfolio choice with respect to estimation errors in expected returns. We consider a one-period model with a set of risky assets (with multivariate normal returns) whose expected returns are estimated with uncertainty and a linear sharing rul...
متن کاملStatistical Decisions under Ambiguity
Consider a decision maker who faces a number of possible models of the world. Every model generates objective probabilities, but no probabilities of models are given. This is the classic setting of statistical decision theory; recent and less standard applications include decision making with model uncertainty, e.g. due to concerns for misspecification, treatment choice with partial identificat...
متن کاملAmbiguity and Ambiguity Aversion
Consider the following choice problem, known as “Ellsberg’s three-color urn example”, or simply the “Ellsberg Paradox” (Ellsberg [7]). An urn contains 30 red balls, and 60 green and blue balls, in unspecified proportions; subjects are asked to compare (i) a bet on a red draw vs. a bet on a green draw, and (ii) a bet on a red or blue draw vs. a bet on a green or blue draw. If the subject wins a ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
سال: 2010
ISSN: 0095-0696
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2009.05.001